Gust v. Gust
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered May 6, 1912, dismissing an action for divorce at defendant’s cost, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Action for divorce, and appeal from judgment dismissing the action. Respondent also appeals from that portion of the judgment awarding appellant attorney’s fees and costs, and permitting amendments to the complaint, *696and moves to dismiss the appeal of appellant, and to strike the opening brief and a statement of facts certified to in connection with an application by appellant for suit money, which was denied and which is' incorporated in the appeal. These contentions will first be noticed. The conclusion we have reached makes it unnecessary to notice respondent’s appeal upon the award of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Magee v. RisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Miller v. GustWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Barrinuevo v. BarrinuevoWashington Supreme Court · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.