Legal Opinion
Malaspina v. Itts
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 20, 1966No. File No. CV 12-6511-6676PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rubinow, Chief Judge.
On April 23, 1965, Jacqueline A. Itts instituted a paternity action *652against Andrew A. Malaspina, alleging that he is the father of a child born to her on January 8, 1965, and begotten “on or about April 1, 1964.”1 On August 6, 1965, the court (Reicher, J.) rendered judgment in that action against Malaspina. On November 8,1965, he brought this petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence,2 alleging in substance that he and his wife were in New York City on April 10,1964. This was the date on which, according to the petition and supporting exhibits,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Hoberman v. Lake of Isles, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Palverari v. FintaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Morant v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In re James L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Morant v. State, No. Cv 97-039876-S (Jul. 26, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999