Legal Opinion
In re James L.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 19, 1999No. AC 17869; AC 18155PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The respondents appeal from the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights *338with respect to their son, James L., rendered on a coterminous petition filed by the commissioner of children and families (commissioner).1 On appeal, the respondents claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied the respondent mother’s motion to dismiss the first and second counts of the petition made at the close of the commissioner’s case, (2) denied the respondent mother’s motion to remove documents attached to the petition, (3) denied the respondents’ motions for a new trial…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Elliott v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Terracino v. Fairway Asset Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Davis v. FracassoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re James L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.