Legal Opinion

Gutowsky v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1955No. 36519PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an action on open account brought by the plaintiff) Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company, against the defendants, Marie Gutowsky and Chester E. Gutowsky) Executors of the Estate, of Assaph (Ace) Gutowsky, deceased) The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

• No question is raised as to the correctness of the account nor the performance of the labor and furnishing of the' materials for which the charges were made. The sole defense was that the account was not that of the individual, Ace Gutowsky, now deceased, but .rather, was the account of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Kansas City Star Publishing Co. v. Standard Warehouse Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Wilson v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Cooke v. TownleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Reed v. Richards & Conover Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Associates Discount CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Kansas Electric Supply Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Dun and Bradstreet, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Barnhart v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. City of Bedford Heights v. TallaricoOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Beckman, Inc. v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API