Legal Opinion

Pundy v. Department of Professional Regulation

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 15, 1991No. 1—89—1702, 1—89—3296 consPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

This opinion addresses two consolidated appeals of the plaintiff, Andrew B. Pundy, involving the suspension of his medical license. The first is an interlocutory appeal challenging the constitutionality of section 41 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Medical Practice Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 111, par. 4400—41), which prohibits the issuance of a stay of sanctions while judicial proceedings are pending. The second is an appeal of the circuit court's decision to uphold the decision of the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation finding Dr. Pundy guilty of professional misconduct…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Homefinders, Inc. v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chastek v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gigger v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Siddiqui v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Albazzaz v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Wilson v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Danigeles v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API