Legal Opinion
Tomingas v. Douglas Aircraft Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 22, 1968No. 64 CIV. 3853PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant pursuant to Rule 26(d) (2) and Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to vacate a notice of deposition directed to two of its employees.
The cause of action arises out of the crash, on November 29, 1963, near Ste-Therese, Canada, of a DC-8 aircraft manufactured by Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Douglas”), causing the death of plaintiff’s decedent. Pursuant to an investigation conducted by the Canadian government, and at that government’s request, Douglas sent two of its employees, Mr. Charles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Branyan v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Kolb v. A. H. Bull Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. Dorothy McAllisterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Willard Crimm v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Haymes v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
- Calderon v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2013
- Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Mill-Run Tours, Inc. v. KhashoggiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.