Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Company, a Body Corporate, and Cross-Appellee v. Home Utilities Company, Incorporated, a Body Corporate, and Cross
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1956No. 7172_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
Eastman Kodak Company (hereinafter called Eastman) brought, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, a civil action against Home Utilities Company, Incorporated (hereinafter called Home Utilities) seeking an injunction to prevent Home Utilities from selling Eastman products at less than the “Fair-Trade” prices, under the Maryland Fair Trade Act, Laws of 1937, Chapter 239; Maryland Code, 1951, Article 83, §§ 102-110.
The District Judge granted a permanent injunction against such price-cutting by Home Utilities in the sale of Eastman cameras, film,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norman's on the Waterfront, Inc. v. WheatleyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
- Gillette Company v. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Lepore v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Gadol v. Dart Drug Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Heublein, Inc. v. Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.