Legal Opinion

Goolsby v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1995No. Docket 164133, 164260PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

The charging parties appeal as of right from an April 16, 1993, decision and order on remand of the Michigan Employment Relations Commission in Docket No. 164133. In Docket No. 164260, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (afscme) cross appeals from the decision of the merc to award attorney fees and costs to the charging parties. We affirm in part and reverse the award of attorney fees and costs to the charging parties.

This case has a long history. The charging parties belonged to a group of sanitation workers, known as "white wingers,” within the Environmental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Goolsby v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1564 v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Martin v. East Lansing School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Burnside v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Folsom v. Montana Public Employees' Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Folsom V.Whitefish Police MPEAMontana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API