Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1564 v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1991No. 85589, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
This action arises under MCL 423.210(l)(e); MSA 17.455(10)(l)(e) of the public employment relations act. Amalgamated Transit Union has charged that the Southeastern Michigan Transit Authority (now the Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation) committed an unfair labor practice by unilaterally altering a term or condition of employment, specifically the disciplinary scheme applicable to probationary employees. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, which upheld the conclusion of the Michigan Employment Relations Commission that semta did engage in an unfair labor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Adrian School District v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Pierson Sand and Gravel, Inc. v. Keeler Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- St Clair Intermediate School District v. Intermediate Education Ass'n/Michigan Education Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Lumley v. U of M Bd of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.