Legal Opinion

Goolsby v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1984No. 66657, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

In this case, we are asked to

determine whether a union’s unexplained failure to process a member’s grievance constitutes a breach of the union’s duty of fair representation.1

*656I

Plaintiffs belonged to a group of sanitation laborers, known as white wingers, within the Environmental Protection and Maintenance Department (EPMD) of defendant City of Detroit. They wore white uniforms, and their duties consisted of picking up refuse from city streets with a hand shovel and a broom and placing it in white wheeled barrels which they pushed. Plaintiffs were represented exclusively by defendant labor…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. N.A.A.C.P., Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API