Legal Opinion

People v. Arnold

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1995No. 94CA0617PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MARQUEZ.

Defendant, Carmen Katherine Arnold, appeals from the order denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Crim.P. 35(b). The trial court held that the motion was not timely filed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant entered a guilty plea to one count of theft, and on February 2, 1990, she was sentenced to four years probation. Approximately two years later, the state filed a motion to revoke defendant’s probation, alleging certain violations of the conditions imposed in conjunction with the sentence.

Following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. FuquaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. United States v. FerriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Glenn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Mamula v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. People v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. People v. BassfordColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. GreslColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. KitsmillerColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. McPhersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API