Legal Opinion

Richard v. Maine Central Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 3, 1933PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

These cases arise out of a collision between an automobile, in which two of the plaintiffs were passengers, and a freight train standing on a highway crossing. In two of the cases the plaintiffs who are minors bring suit for personal injuries, in the other two their respective fathers seek to recover for medical expenses. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the presiding Justice directed a nonsuit, and the cases are before us on exceptions to this ruling.

On December 28th, 1932, about eight o’clock in the evening the two plaintiffs, Alma Richard and Marion Sylvester, were riding in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  4. Gage v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  5. Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Squyres v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Hendrickson v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API