Hendrickson v. Union Pacific Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
J. W. Hendrickson brought this action against the Union Pacific Railroad Company and Frank L. Blankenship and Claude Sweem, the conductor and engineer, respectively, of the train involved, to recover damages for injuries sustained by him as the result of coming in contact with one of its trains. At the close of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff its sufficiency was challenged by the defendants, which challenge was sustained. The plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial which the court denied. Judgment of dismissal was entered, from which this appeal is taken.
The challenge to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Gage v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Elliott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Prescott v. Hines, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Hawkins v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Broberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
- Cox v. Polson Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.