Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. Union Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1943No. 28523PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

J. W. Hendrickson brought this action against the Union Pacific Railroad Company and Frank L. Blankenship and Claude Sweem, the conductor and engineer, respectively, of the train involved, to recover damages for injuries sustained by him as the result of coming in contact with one of its trains. At the close of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff its sufficiency was challenged by the defendants, which challenge was sustained. The plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial which the court denied. Judgment of dismissal was entered, from which this appeal is taken.

The challenge to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Gage v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Elliott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Prescott v. Hines, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Hawkins v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Broberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Cox v. Polson Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API