Legal Opinion
Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 18, 2001No. AC 20640PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiffs, Michael Ammirata and Margaret Ammirata, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Redding (zoning board), which sustained the issuance of a cease and desist order by the Redding zoning enforcement officer, the defendant Aimee Pardee (zoning officer).1
On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that (1) the Redding zoning commission (zoning commission) is barred by the principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel from asserting zoning violations that it has litigated or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Kneeland v. New England Merchants National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Zoning Commission v. LescynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Ammirata v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Raymond v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Taylor v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Ammirata v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.