Legal Opinion
Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 20, 2004No. AC 20640PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. It ruled in Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 264 Conn. 737, 826 A.2d 170 (2003), that this court in Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 65 Conn. App. 606, 782 A.2d 1285 (2001), improperly had declined to review, because of an inadequate *195record,1 the plaintiffs’ claim that the Redding zoning commission was barred by principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel from asserting zoning violations that it had litigated or had the opportunity to litigate in a prior zoning injunction action against the plaintiffs.2 *196W…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harley P. Grose v. Wilbur Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Isaac v. Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of the Town of Wallingford v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- South Windsor v. LanataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Ammirata v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004