Legal Opinion
United States v. Alamillo
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 21, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-F-1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on defendant’s pro se Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, filed November 9, 1990. An evidentiary hearing is not necessary, as the record shows conclusively that defendant is not entitled to relief. United States v. Marr, 856 F.2d 1471, 1472 (10th Cir. 1988). For the reasons stated below, defendant’s Motion is denied. 1
On November 15, 1988, defendant was charged in a three count indictment. Count I charged conspiracy to possess with intent to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RobelSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jessie W. Collins v. Cecil Cundy, Campbell County Attorney and Sheriff Hladky, Sheriff of Campbell CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James Sam MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BarthColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
- United States v. Felipe AlamilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- People v. MayesColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Sammy Abeyta v. Frank O. Gunter ((Sic) Frank R. Gunter) Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992