Legal Opinion

United States v. James Sam Marr

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1988No. 86-2770PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

James Sam Marr was convicted after jury trial in federal court for conspiracy to distribute drugs in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On direct appeal, this court affirmed his conviction, sub nom. United States v. Killip, 819 F.2d 1542 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 186, 98 L.Ed.2d 139 (1987). Marr then moved to vacate his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court summarily denied Marr’s motion and he appeals. We VACATE and REMAND for further proceedings.

Marr filed his § 2255 motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Edward W. Newfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Dan Hedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. KillipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Roger Dale CountsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. TushDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  2. United States v. MossDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  3. United States v. AlamilloDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  4. United States v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. United States v. Dwight Lee AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API