Legal Opinion
United States v. Felipe Alamillo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1991No. 91-1129PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Alamillo, 754 F.Supp. 827 (D.Colo.1990). Appellant, Felipe Alam-illo, contends the district court erred in not vacating his sentence because the sentence includes a provision for supervised release. We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. James Darriel OrrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. AlamilloDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Deshawn Lee Robinson A/K/A Leland Kirk, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Jeffrey Meekes A/K/A Orris Weathington, United States of America v. Keith Jackson A/K/A Kevin McElhannonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- People v. BarthColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. MayesColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Dais-Naid, Inc. v. Phoenix Resource Companies, Inc. (In re Texas International Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Richard L. Larson v. Donald A. Dorsey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.