Legal Opinion
American Indemnity Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. Samuel Stamping & Enameling Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1952No. 11384_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The appeal in 11,383 is from a judgment on a manufacturer’s and contractor’s liability policy, issued by the appellant to the Samuel Stamping & Enameling Company, insuring it against any liability for claims against it based upon defects in its product, and covering specifically its Homart floor furnace. The policy had been extended, by endorsement, to include Sears, Roebuck & Company, as retailer of this product. The appeal in 11,384 is from a judgment of dismissal without prejudice in a companion suit by Sears against Samuel. The cases were tried together, brought here…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Home Benefit Assn. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Grand Fraternity v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoritzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Meadows v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Christian v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Parsons Corporation v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- John P. McNally and Tom McNally D/B/A McNally Elevator Service Company, Plaintiff's-Appellees v. American States Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988
- Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Izzy Rosen's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.