Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Moritz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1940No. 8892PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appeal is from a judgment in favor of Moritz against the Maryland Casualty Company for attorney’s fees incurred by him in defending a damage suit against him and others. Appellee alleged that the Casualty Company was bound to pay such fees under an indemnity insurance policy carried by Moritz with that company. The suit in which the attorney’s fee was incurred was by the wife and children of Rob Marshall against Moritz, doing business under the name of O. K. Freight Lines; L. O. Wells, doing business under the name of L. O. Wells Fruit & Produce Company; S. A. and Percy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christian v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Allen v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. McManusTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. St. Paul Insurance Co. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Laura Marie Rhodes v. Chicago Insurance Company, a Division of Interstate National CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. VAPPI & CO. INC. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API