United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“USF & G”), seeks a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that USF & G is not obligated under certain insurance policies purchased by defendant, the Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company (“Murray Ohio”), either to defend or to idemnify Murray Ohio regarding claims made against it in a lawsuit styled United States v. Conservation Chemical Co., No. 82-093-CV-W-5 (W.D.Mo.) (the “CCC litigation”). Murray Ohio has counterclaimed, seeking the Court’s declaration that it is entitled to a defense…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Techalloy Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Great Lakes Container Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Lower Paxon Township v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- New Castle County v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- O'Brien Energy Systems, Inc. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.