Legal Opinion
Bath Industries, Inc. v. Blot
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 3, 1969No. Civ. A. 69-C-453PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
REYNOLDS, District Judge,
Bath Industries, Inc., brings this suit for preliminary injunction to prevent defendants from voting the Bath stock they hold, requesting a special shareholders’ meeting or a copy of the shareholders’ list, and from acquiring any shares of Bath stock or warrants. It is the contention of Bath that defendants failed to comply with section 13(d) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78m(d)) also referred to as the Williams Act.
Bath more specifically claims that defendants have acted as a “group”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Zorn v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- GAF Corp. v. MilsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Scott v. Multi-Amp CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Prettner v. AstonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- Black & Company v. Nova-Tech, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.