Legal Opinion
Zorn v. Anderson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1966No. 66 Civ. 1905PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COOPER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 12(b) (3) of the F.R.Civ.P., defendants move to dismiss the action for improper venue, or in the alternative, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a), to transfer the action to Massachusetts. Motions denied.
Plaintiff claims violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S. C. § 80a-l et seq., the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U. S.C. § 78a et seq.
As to Venue
Venue is determined not by reference to the general venue provisions, 28 U.S.C. § 1391, but to the special venue provisions…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Thiele v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Kane v. Central American Mining & Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. VigmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Bath Industries, Inc. v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- SST GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. ChapmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.