Legal Opinion

Austin Co. v. Woods

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DROWOTA, Justice.

Austin Company and Arapahoe Chemicals, Inc., sued the Commissioner of Revenue to recover sales and use taxes, penalty and interest totalling $19,211.58 paid under protest for consulting, engineering, design and procurement services rendered by Austin to Arapahoe as well as for overhead and profit in connection with the construction of a chemical manufacturing facility in Newport, Tennessee. The Chancellor held for the plaintiffs and awarded them a refund of the taxes paid plus interest. The Com*74missioner has perfected a direct appeal from the final order of the Chancellor.

Arapa…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Can Co. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Brodbine v. TorrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cities Service Co. v. TidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hoyer-Schlesinger-Turner, Inc. v. BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dominion National Bank v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. AT & T v. Ruth JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Health & Educational Families Board v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API