Brodbine v. Torrence
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
The Chancellor dismissed the complaint in this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and plaintiff appealed.
Plaintiff, Brodbine, is a restaurant operator in Nashville who is licensed to sell alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises of his restaurant, “Tara.” He filed this suit as a class action on behalf of himself and 149 others licensed in Nashville for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-the-premises consumption, alleging that the defendant Metropolitan Government had collected and was continuing to collect unlawful taxes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smoky Mountain Canteen Co. v. KizerTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- Dairyland Harvestore, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Admiralty Suites And Inns, LLC v. Shelby County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Dominion National Bank v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Austin Co. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.