Legal Opinion

Brodbine v. Torrence

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

The Chancellor dismissed the complaint in this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and plaintiff appealed.

Plaintiff, Brodbine, is a restaurant operator in Nashville who is licensed to sell alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises of his restaurant, “Tara.” He filed this suit as a class action on behalf of himself and 149 others licensed in Nashville for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-the-premises consumption, alleging that the defendant Metropolitan Government had collected and was continuing to collect unlawful taxes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smoky Mountain Canteen Co. v. KizerTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dairyland Harvestore, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Admiralty Suites And Inns, LLC v. Shelby County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Dominion National Bank v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Austin Co. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API