Legal Opinion

Cities Service Co. v. Tidwell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Chief Justice.

Cities Service Company, as plaintiff, sued the Commissioner of Revenue to recover sales taxes, penalty and interest, paid under protest, levied upon engineering, design, procurement and administrative services rendered by Parsons-Jurden Corporation incident to the purchase of industrial machinery from others. Recovery was also sought of penalties assessed upon sales and use taxes, the validity of which is admitted, but, it is said, the equities demand remission of the penalties.

The Chancellor held that the services of Parsons-Jurden Corporation were not subject to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crescent Amusement Co. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Swartz v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. State v. Natco CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Combustion Engineering Company v. McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. Daniel v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  3. ELEC. POWER BD. OF MET. GOV'T, ETC. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Electric Power Board v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Austin Co. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API