Legal Opinion

Dominion National Bank v. Olsen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

In this case three Virginia banks have filed an action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief, contending that a 1982 amendment to the Tennessee domestic income tax statutes discriminates against interstate commerce. The statute in question, Tennessee Public Acts 1982, Chapter 652 amended T.C.A. § 67-2601(b) so as to make taxable to Tennessee residents interest income on long-term certificates of deposit1 *216in out-of-state banks. Previously all interest on certificates of deposit had been exempted, and after the 1982 statute, interest on such certificates of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Shelton v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. American Can Co. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dominion National Bank v. Martha B. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow Prop., Inc. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Angel v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API