Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee

Decided February 27, 1893No. 3,114PublishedCited by 15 opinions

At Law. Action by Viola W. Burrow against the Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis Railroad Company. Heard on motion to retax costs.

Read the full summary

At Law. Action by Viola W. Burrow against the Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis Railroad Company. Heard on motion to retax costs. Statement by HAMMOND, J.: This was an action at law against a foreign corporation for damages claimed by plaintiff from the defendant for negligently causing the death of her husband in Arkansas, and it resulted in a verdict in the defendant’s favor with judgment for costs against the plaintiff and the surety on her $250 prosecution bond in the case. The only items involved in the motion are the fees of four of the defendant’s witnesses. The case was continued two…

1Opinion of the Court

HAMMOND, J.,

(after stating the facts.) Costs in the federal courts include, among” other items, “the amount paid printers and *280witnesses,” (Rev. St. § 984,) and defendant can therefore recover here only the amount actually paid bv it to each of these witnesses, (O’Neil v. Railroad Co., 31 Fed. Rep. 663; Beckwith v. Easton, 4 Ben. 358; The Highlander, 19 How. Pr. 334.) And it cannot even recover the amount so paid if in any instance such amount exceed the legal fees due to the witness. Nor can these fees of the different witnesses be grouped together, in order to make the sum equal or exceed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whipple v. Cumberland Cotton Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1844
  2. Spaulding v. TuckerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1871
  3. Prouty v. DraperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
  4. Anderson v. MoeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1869
  5. Woodruff v. BarneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1862

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. Barnhart v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1949
  4. United States v. Theron C. Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County, State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Hanchett v. HumphreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API