Legal Opinion
Galbiso v. Orosi Public Utility District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 2008No. F053236PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Appellant Mary Jane Galbiso (Galbiso) and respondent Orosi Public Utility District (OPUD) have a long-running dispute relating to the sewer assessments imposed by OPUD against Galbiso’s land and the efforts by OPUD to enforce those assessments. The present appeal involves a distinct aspect of the parties’ controversy. Specifically, Galbiso filed a complaint alleging that OPUD violated the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 2 et seq.; hereafter the Brown Act) by the manner in which it conducted meetings and made decisions, and further, that OPUD violated the California…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Filarsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Galbiso v. Orosi Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Crews v. Willows Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn. v. Bd.of Pilot Commissioners CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.