Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Klineman & NJS Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*775OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley L. Sklar, J.
Can a home improvement contractor, which was unlicensed at the time a contract was solicited and executed, collect for work performed under the contract after the contractor’s license application has been accepted by the Department of Consumer Affairs (the Department)? I hold that the contractor can collect for such work if the homeowners have ratified the contract after the contractor’s license application has been accepted.
Petitioners Kent Klineman, an attorney, and Hedy Kline-man move pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) to permanently stay the arbitration…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beacon Terminal Corp. v. Chemprene, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- B & F Building Corp. v. LiebigNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lloyd Capital Corp. v. Pat Henchar, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schlaifer v. SedlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hirsch v. HirschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Fong v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Mindich Developers, Inc. v. MilsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- Nemard Construction Corp. v. DeafeamkporNew York Supreme Court · 2008