Legal Opinion
Nemard Construction Corp. v. Deafeamkpor
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 2008Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Dominic R. Massaro, J.
Defendant Vicky Deafeamkpor moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), alternatively seeking to (1) set plaintiff’s verdict aside, (2) dismiss the underlying complaint, (3) order a new trial, and (4) stay all efforts at collection. She challenges the verdict because plaintiff is neither registered as a corporation by the State nor properly licensed by New York City.
Ms. Deafeamkpor wants the verdict set aside, in essence, because she claims Nemard Construction Corp. lacked the capacity to commence this action inasmuch as it is not a corporate…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- B & F Building Corp. v. LiebigNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re the Arbitration Between Niagara Wheatfield Administrators Ass'n & Niagara Wheatfield Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Todisco v. EconopoulyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Chosen Construction Corp. v. SyzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.