Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scrimsher v. Scrimsher

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1986No. 15167Published

1DissentHuntley, Justice

The majority errs by confining its analysis to a discussion of whether there was an oral agreement between Mrs. Scrimsher and the Scrimsher children. As I perceive the issue, the question is not whether an oral agreement was reached by the parties, but rather whether a written agreement, independent of any oral conversation, existed and, further, whether there was partial performance. The majority has failed to incorporate several significant and, I believe, controlling facts in its statement of facts. Therefore, I will take this opportunity to set forth those facts which the majority omits.

Af…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hamilton v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API