Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hamilton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. A-4760PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

We are concerned here indirectly, at least, with two separate and distinct causes of action.

First, the petitioner, Cleo Mason Hamilton, surviving wife of W. B. Hamilton and principal beneficiary of his last will, offered the will for probate. Norman Hamilton, the respondent and son of W. B. Hamilton by a previous marriage, contested the application on the ground of mental incapacity and undue influence, and apealed to the district court from an order admitting the will to probate.

Second, Norman Hamilton filed suit in the district court against Cleo Hamilton, individually and as independent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chace v. GreggTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Garza v. DeMontalvoTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cleveland v. MilnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. v. AkinTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pierce v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McGuire v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Williamson v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API