Rey-Bellet v. Engelhardt
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
These appeals are from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention of the sole count in issue to Schindler, the senior party of this three party interference.1 We reverse the board’s decision and hold that priority should have been awarded to £he party Engel-hardt.
The Appeals
Schindler is involved in these appeals on application serial No. 282,874, filed May 24, 1963, as a continuation-in-part of application serial No. 179,482, filed March 13, 1962. Schindler claimed and *1382was accorded the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Marshall B. Alpert v. Harvey L. SlatinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of George H. Hitchings, Gertrude B. Elion and Irving GoodmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Robert Harvey Rines v. Harry C. MorganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., and Novopharm, Inc. And Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Yoshihiro Fujikawa, Mikio Suzuki, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuaki Sakashita and Masaki Kitahara v. Sompong Wattanasin, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard KeilhauerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Jean C. Kridl and Robert M. Goodman v. Francis P. McCormick Kenneth A. Barton, and William F. SwainCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.