Legal Opinion
Kinser v. Gehl Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1999No. 98-3152PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Gehl Company appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for new trial following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in this product liability lawsuit. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I
Prior to his death, Tim Kinser operated a farm in Jennings, Kansas. On August 17, 1994, while baling alfalfa with his Gehl model 1870 big round baler, Kinser became entangled up to his waist in the compression rollers of the baler’s feed intake unit. Farmhand Jeff Rhoades first…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Watkins v. Telsmith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Black v. M & W Gear CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.