Legal Opinion
United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2000No. 98-3222, 98-3233, 98-3279 and 99-3099PublishedCited by 198 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
United Phosphorus (United) brought this action against Midland Fumigant (Midland), and its president, Donald Fox, claiming violation of the Lanham Act, fraudulent trademark registration, trademark infringement, unfair competition, violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), and common law fraud, all in conjunction with Midland’s use of the “Quiek-Phos” trademark for the fumigant aluminum phos-phide. Following trial, a jury found in favor of United on every claim save the RICO claim and awarded United a total of $2,075,929 in damages. The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Donald Dean Walker, Debtor. Donald Dean Walker v. Kenneth G.M. Mather, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- Southern California Darts Assn v. Dino M. ZaffinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mark MacSenti and Cross v. Jon D. Becker, D.D.S. And Cross-Appellee, Heather DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Southwest Stainless, LP v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Patsy's Italian Restaurant, Inc. v. BanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Eateries, Inc. v. J. R. Simplot Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.