Legal Opinion

State v. Medrano-Barraza

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 8, 1997No. 1 CA-CR 97-0119PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Jose Medrano-Barraza appeals the sentence imposed by the superior court after a conviction for criminal trespass. Because the trial court did not properly advise defendant of the rights he waived by admitting prior convictions, we remand for further proceedings.

We first summarize the facts. A grand jury indicted defendant on one count of second-degree burglary, a class 3 felony. The State alleged historical prior convictions. After a trial on the merits, a jury acquitted defendant of the burglary charge, but convicted him of the lesser offense of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. BacaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. State v. AlvaradoArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. State v. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Lyons v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. In Re Kyle M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API