Legal Opinion

In Re Kyle M.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 7, 2001No. 1 CA-JV 00-0179PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The juvenile court adjudicated Kyle M. delinquent for threatening or intimidating, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1202(A)(1) (Supp. 2000). Kyle argues we should reverse because the State failed to prove that he (1) acted with “wrongful intent,” as required by the statute, and (2) uttered a “true threat” to the victim. He further contends that if A.R.S. section 13-1202(A)(1) does not require a perpetrator to act with wrongful intent, it is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. Alfredo Orozco-SantillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Citizen Publishing Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. In re Jessie T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. In Re Kalib A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API