In Re Kyle M.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The juvenile court adjudicated Kyle M. delinquent for threatening or intimidating, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1202(A)(1) (Supp. 2000). Kyle argues we should reverse because the State failed to prove that he (1) acted with “wrongful intent,” as required by the statute, and (2) uttered a “true threat” to the victim. He further contends that if A.R.S. section 13-1202(A)(1) does not require a perpetrator to act with wrongful intent, it is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Alfredo Orozco-SantillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Citizen Publishing Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- In re Jessie T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- In Re Kalib A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.