Coggeshall v. Park
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
1. Extraordinary motions for new trial are not favored. Perry v. State, 117 Ga. 719 (45 S. E. 77) ; Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449 (40 S. E. 268) ; Burge v. State, 133 Ga. 431 (66 S. E. 243) ; Bass v. State, 154 Ga. 112, 115 (113 S. E. 524).
*792. The extraordinary motions for new trials contemplated by our statute are such as do not ordinarily occur in the transaction of human affairs, as when a man has been convicted of murder, and it afterwards appears that the supposed deceased is still alive, or where one is convicted on the testimony of a witness who is subsequently found, guilty of perjury in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Burge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Epps v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Fender v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Federal Investment Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Windsor Forest, Inc. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Loomis v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.