Legal Opinion

Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1995No. A94A2383PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs, Alice B. Hamilton and her husband, Billy C. Hamilton, sued defendants, Thomas Caine, Betty James, Otis Grant and Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., after Alice Hamilton was injured in an automobile collision. Alamo appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment.

The evidence in this case, construed in a light most favorable to plaintiffs, demonstrates the following: On February 20, 1991, Alice Hamilton was struck by a car driven by Grant. Grant was charged with driving under the influence, driving left of the centerline and with having no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Stations Inc. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Medlock v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Grant v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Shmunes v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hunsucker v. BelfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Watson v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc. v. Generali - U. S. BranchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc. v. Generali — U. S. BranchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Scott v. Joe Thomson Auto Rental & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API