Legal Opinion
A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc. v. Generali - U. S. Branch
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 19, 1999No. S98G0978PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hines, Justice.
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals to consider its decision in A. Atlanta AutoSave v. Generali — U. S. Branch, 230 Ga. App. 887 (498 SE2d 278) (1998), an appeal in an action for declaratory judgment about the priority of insurance coverage for a rental vehicle involved in a collision. We affirm because the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the car rental agency, AutoSave, could not avail itself of the exemption provided a U-drive-it owner under OCGA § 40-9-102,1 rendering its insurance for the rental car primary for coverage of the collision.
The facts are set…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Integon Indemnity Corporation v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Stepho v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- American Cyanamid Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Geico v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jordan v. Spirit Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- New Hampshire Indem v. Budget Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- New Hampshire Indemnity Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Scott v. Joe Thomson Auto Rental & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.