Hunsucker v. Belford
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Doyle, Judge.
Following the denial of their motion for summary judgment, defendants Jamie Ray and Marie Hunsucker filed this interlocutory appeal, contending that the trial court erred by concluding that material issues of fact remain as to Wanda Belford’s claims against them for wrongful death and negligent entrustment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Tuggle v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- McQuaig v. TarrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Purvis v. SteveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- REDMON v. DANIELCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- IRELAND v. WILLIAMS Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Moore v. CamaraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- POLITZER v. XIAOYAN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Foothills Pharmacies, Inc. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.