Legal Opinion

Medlock v. Barfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1954No. 35164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The defendant Medlock admits that Taylor was negligent, was an untrained driver, and had permission to drive Medlock’s automobile in a specified area, and that Medlock knew Taylor was an untrained driver. Medlock concedes his liability if Taylor had driven into the plaintiff’s automobiles while driving around the block designated. He contends that Taylor was a bailee of the car for the sole purpose of driving it around the block and, in using it for another purpose and for a longer time than was agreed upon, was guilty of a conversion and so is solely responsible for the damages incurred tó…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. NuGrape Bottling Co. v. KnottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Burks v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Crisp v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Stations Inc. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Mayor of Columbus v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brown v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Thomason v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Butts v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API