Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 31, 1991PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The employee, John Nielsen, appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Appellate Division) affirming a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission). Because the Commission did not err in including three weeks of paid vacation time in the number of weeks worked for purposes of determining Nielsen’s average weekly wage pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 2(2)(B) (1989), we affirm the Appellate Division.

In 1988, Nielsen sustained a gradual compensable injury while working for Burnham & Morrill, Inc., and he petitioned the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Fowler v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Senty v. Board of Osteopathic Examination & RegistrationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Clark v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Warren v. H.T. Winters Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Berube v. Rust EngineeringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Bowie v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Curtis v. National Sea ProductsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API