Legal Opinion

Berube v. Rust Engineering

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 13, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The employer, Rust Engineering, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission granting the petitions of its employee, Bertram W. Berube, for an award of compensation and to fix the amount to be allowed for a work-related injury sustained by him. Rust contends the Commission erred in determining that, pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 62-B(3)(A)(2) (1989),1 it is entitled to offset against compensation paid Be-rube only that monthly amount attributable to Rust’s contribution to the pension fund *876rather than the entire $1,452 that Berube received monthly from that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  5. Berry v. H.R. Beal & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. James M. Dickau v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Guilford Transportation Industries v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. O'Connor v. Oakhurst DairyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  4. Delogu v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Melanson v. BelyeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API