Legal Opinion
Resso v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 21, 2014No. AC35171PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, the Administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act, 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court reversing the decision of the Employment Security Board of Review (board) denying benefits to the plaintiff, Lynne Resso. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly determined that there were insufficient facts found by the board to establish a finding of wilful misconduct. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, as found by the board, are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff worked as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Priest v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Fullerton v. Department of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ray v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMP.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cragg v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Martinez v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Seward v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019