Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Brunton Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Currently pending before me are motions brought by defendants, Silva Production AB and The Brunton Company under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Brun-ton Company also ■ moves for a change of venue pursuant to rule 12(b)(3). For the reasons set forth below, all of these motions are denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following facts are derived from the Amended Complaint and from the parties’ evidentiary submissions, as indicated. Additional facts will be discussed as necessary.
Plaintiffs Johnson…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Preussag Aktiengesellschaft v. Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- PKWare, Inc. v. MeadeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Search Force, Inc. v. Dataforce International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Wayne Pigment Corp. v. HaloxDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- Shepherd Investments International, Ltd. v. Verizon Communications Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.