Legal Opinion
Wayne Pigment Corp. v. Halox
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 17, 2002No. 02C0203PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wayne Pigment Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation whose principal place of business is Wisconsin, alleges that defendants Halox and Hammond Group, Inc., actively induced infringement of United States Patent 6,113,989 (the ’989 patent), in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). The ’989 patent is entitled “Aequeous Paint Additive for Staining Inhibition and Procedures.” (ComplA 9.) Defendant Hammond Group, Inc., is an Indiana corporation whose principal place of business is Hammond, Indiana, and defendant Ha-lox is a division of Hammond, whose…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pacer Global Logistics, Inc. v. National Passenger RR Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Shepherd Investments International, Ltd. v. Verizon Communications Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Kubin-Nicholson Corp. v. GillonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- Norkol/Fibercore, Inc. v. GubbDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.