Preussag Aktiengesellschaft v. Coleman
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRY B. COHEN, Justice.
Preussag Aktiengesellschaft (“Preussag AG”) takes this interlocutory appeal from an order denying its special appearance. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (Vernon Supp.2000). The issue in this appeal is whether a German holding corporation, whose relations with its indirect 2 Texas subsidiaries are virtually its sole Texas contacts, must defend, in a Brazoria County court, a cause of action based on its sales of products to Iraq, when those products were allegedly converted to weapons and later used against American soldiers. We answer this…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Michel v. Rocket Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Villagomez v. Rockwood Specialties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Glattly v. CMS Viron Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Touradji v. Beach Capital Partnership, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.