Legal Opinion
Styskal v. Weld County Board of County Commissioners
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 13, 2004No. 03-1179PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Patricia Styskal appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of her claims against Appellees Mike Witman, John Kielian, and Dale Beverly. She contends that because the district court held that it lacked supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 to hear her state-law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corporation and Fiber Trim Sewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Steele v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Douglas Crotwell and Alexandra Crotwell, His Wife v. Hockman-Lewis Limited, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Carol Gold v. Local 7 United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 7Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by49 opinions
- Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Exum v. United States Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- City of Albuquerque v. Soto Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- C.T. v. Liberal School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Robey v. Shapiro, Marianos & Cejda, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.